







| Can A Woman Be Saved Through Childbearing? |
|
|
|
| Written by Hank Hanegraaff | |||
| Tuesday, 22 September 2009 04:11 | |||
|
First, in the Jewish culture of Paul’s day, it was believed that if women died during childbirth, that it was a direct punishment for Eve’s role in the Fall. Thus, Paul may very well be assuring believers that women will be kept safe through the process of childbirth. “if the continue in faith, love and holiness with propriety” (2:15). As such, Pauls’ words refute the denigration of women both in the culture and in the Church. Furthermore, men and women alike are ultimately saved as a result of the most significant birth in the history of humanity. Thus, Paul may also be alluding to the fact that just as “the woman [Eve] was deceived and became a sinner” (v.14), so the woman (Mary) conceived and brought forth the Savior. Finally, salvation here cannot mean salvation in the ultimate sense. If it did, women would not be saved by God’s grace through faith alone. Unlike men, they would also have to bear children. This is not only absurd, but stands in direct opposition to the unambiguous teaching of Scripture (viz. John 14:6, Ephesians 2:8,9 & Galatians 3:28). Remember that which is cloudy must always be interpreted in the light of that which is clear. “For it is by grace that you have been saved, through faith - and this is not from yourselves, it is the gift of God - not by works, so that no one can boast.”
|
|||
| Last Updated on Tuesday, 29 June 2010 08:50 |
Scientific scepticism with the Darwinian postulate is gaining momentum, but we have to be cautious how we use that information...
A 'comprehensive scientific study' has conclusively shown that intercessory prayer does not work... oh really?
Darwin’s General Theory of Evolution (GTE) proposes that fairy tales are indeed possible in real life…